跟着KK开始学习何凯文每日一句！如果你能从开始坚持到结束，对于每一句能够融会贯通，那么你就赢了！下面文都考研带给大家何凯文每日一句：
The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.
题目：
The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive”partly because it________.
[A]bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession
[B]keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares
[C]aggravates the ethical situation in the trade
[D]prevents lawyers from gaining due profits
句子解析：
第一句：
The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business.
费用如此之高的另外一个原因就是这个行业行会一样的限制性的所有制结构。
第二句：
Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.
除开哥伦比亚特区，非律师可能不能拥有任何律所的股票。
The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive”partly because it________.
这种行会似的所有制机构被认为是限制性的，部分原因是什么?
定位到第二句：
Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.
除开哥伦比亚特区，非律师可能不能拥有任何律所的股票。
non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.
non-lawyers：非律师 (不是律师的人) 不是：没有律师!
所以：[B]keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares 不对!
让律师不能拥有律所的股票!
所以答案是：
[A]bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession
禁止局外人参与到这个行业中。
(非律师可能不能拥有任何律所的股票)
原文中的may根本就没有影响A成为正确答案吧!
所以这就是出题人的尺度!
正确答案就是比较出来的!
所以我昨天出题就是按照出题人的尺度来的!
真题：
原文：Except in the District of Columbia，non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm.
选项：law firm bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession
你看真题的选项连：Except in the District of Columbia(除开哥伦比亚特区)，都不会考虑，直接给忽略了!同义替换肯定要省略一些信息啊，不然选项就太长了!
我出的题：
原文：The gap may be related to access to education
出题人：The gap between black and white has much to do with access to education.
(当然因为判断题的原因，你觉得不合适，但我告诉你到了选择题的时候，这个选项很有可能就是最 佳选项!，因为大的方向是一致的，考研英语阅读的错误选项都是“大奸大恶”，没有一个是无辜的“傻白甜”仅仅错了一点点!)
服务号 
在线课程