跟着KK开始学习何凯文每日一句!立法者们在联邦法律是否应该取代州法律的问题上存在分歧,美国有联邦法律,也有各州的法律。还有一个根本大法:宪法;所有的法律都得遵从与宪法的规定。如果你能从开始坚持到结束,对于每一句能够融会贯通,那么你就赢了!下面文都考研带给大家何凯文每日一句:
Testimony from industry groups and advocates previewed plenty of buzzy topics that legislators are likely to probe, from discriminatory pricing to limits on processing certain types of data. But lawmakers are split most starkly over the question of whether a federal law should supersede or take the place of state statutes.
思考题:
There is no consensus among lawmakers concerning the topic of replacing state statutes.
(T or F)
看看词汇:(你们喜欢这种?)
1.testimony:证词
2.industry groups :行业组织
3.advocates:倡导者
4.preview:预先展示
5.buzzy topics:热门话题
6.probe:探究
7.legislator:立法者
8.discriminatory pricing :歧视性定价 (区分定价)
9.processing:处理
10.split:分歧
11.starkly:明显地
12.consensus 一致意见
13.supersede:取代
14.state statutes:州法律
记住:
statutes 是成文法的意思!
statue是雕像
status 是地位
第一句:
Testimony (主语)from industry groups and advocates(定语) previewed plenty of buzzy topics /that legislators are likely to probe(定语从句),from discriminatory pricing to limits on processing certain types of data.
主干识别:
Testimony previewed plenty of buzzy topics
切分成分:
1.from industry groups and advocates 定语
2. that legislators are likely to probe, 定语
3. from discriminatory pricing to limits on processing certain types of data.定语(列举偶那些热门话题,也有语法书说这是同位语)
参考译文:来自行业组织和倡导者的证词预先展示了许多立法者可能会探究的热门话题,从歧视性定价到对处理某些类型数据的限制。
第二句:
But lawmakers are split most starkly over the question of whether a federal law should supersede or take the place of state statutes.
主干识别:
lawmakers are split
切分成分:
1. most starkly 状语
2. over the question 状语
3. of whether a federal law should supersede or take the place of state statutes.定语
参考译文:但是,立法者们在联邦法律是否应该取代州法律的问题上分歧最为明显。
所以思考题:
There is no consensus among lawmakers concerning the topic of replacing state statutes.
立法者们在取代州法律的问题上没有达成共识
是正确的!